Peer-reviewed publication · Livestock · In the living system

A fulvic preparation was studied in older laying hens.

Older hens fed this fulvic acid for eight weeks laid eggs 0.29 g heavier, with slightly stronger shells and fewer breakages, while laying rate and feed use per egg did not change.

Xiao et al., 2 September 2022. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9:953564.

Scope, material and route

Studied
Dawu Golden Phoenix laying hens from 55 weeks of age
Design
Randomised controlled feeding trial
Material
Fulvic acid from Beijing Sloan Biotechnology Co., Ltd; further characterisation not reported in the paper
Route
Feed
Exposure
500 mg/kg of diet. Study exposure, not application guidance.
Duration
Eight weeks

Study design

  1. Basal diet

    The comparison.

    126 hensSix replicates of 21 hens.

  2. Plus fulvic acid

    500 mg per kg of diet, eight weeks.

    126 hensSix replicates of 21 hens.

  3. What changed

    • Egg weight61.08 against 60.79 g, 0.29 g heavier
    • Shell breaking strength3.92 against 3.81 kg/cm²
    • Egg breakage0.42 against 0.65 percent
    • Serum AST19.80 against 28.27 U/L
    • Caecal compositionSome groups shifted in relative abundance
  4. What did not

    • Laying rate83.37 against 81.92 percent
    • Feed-to-egg ratio1.94 against 2.03
    • Caecal diversityNo difference
    • Total antioxidant capacityOpposite directions in the table and the text
One mark per hen, boxed by replicate, the unit for the production measures. Blood came from one hen per replicate and caecal samples from six hens per group. Values are fulvic acid first, basal diet second. The caecal results describe which bacteria were present, not what they were doing.

More study details

Research question
How does dietary fulvic acid affect laying performance, blood biochemistry and caecal microbiota in older hens?
Experimental unit and sample size
252 hens in two groups of six replicates with 21 hens each; blood from one bird per replicate; caecal microbiota from six birds per group
Comparator
Basal diet without fulvic acid
Outcomes measured
Laying rate, egg weight, feed-to-egg ratio, egg quality, serum biochemistry and antioxidant markers, caecal microbiota by 16S rRNA sequencing

Findings

Researchers assigned 252 Dawu Golden Phoenix hens aged 55 weeks to a basal diet or the same diet with 500 mg/kg fulvic acid, for eight weeks. Hens receiving fulvic acid laid slightly heavier eggs (61.08 against 60.79 g) with stronger shells, and fewer eggs broke (0.42 against 0.65 percent). Laying rate and the feed-to-egg ratio did not differ. Some blood markers changed, including lower AST. In the caecum, the relative abundance of some bacterial groups shifted, but microbial diversity did not differ. Observing production and microbial changes together does not establish that one caused the other, or that microbes consumed the preparation.

OutcomeComparison or resultInterpretation
Laying rate83.37 against 81.92 percent (P = 0.59)No statistically supported difference
Egg weight61.08 against 60.79 g (P = 0.03)A small increase
Shell breaking strength3.92 against 3.81 kg/cm² (P = 0.03)A small increase
Egg breakage0.42 against 0.65 percent (P < 0.01)Fewer broken eggs
Feed-to-egg ratio1.94 against 2.03 (P = 0.27)No statistically supported difference
Serum AST19.80 against 28.27 U/L (P = 0.04)Lower with fulvic acid
Antioxidant markersGSH-Px higher (P = 0.02); total antioxidant capacity reported in opposite directions in the table and the textThe total antioxidant capacity result cannot be read with confidence
Caecal microbial diversityNo difference in alpha diversity; no clear separation in beta diversityOverall diversity unchanged
Caecal compositionFirmicutes and Megamonas higher; Proteobacteria and Enterobacter lower (P < 0.01)Shifts in relative abundance, not measured function

Values are fulvic acid group first, control second, as reported in the paper. Values are extracted from the source as reported; no raw data were available.

Interpretation and limits

What this record supports

Small improvements in egg weight, shell strength and breakage for this preparation, dose and flock over eight weeks.

What remains uncertain

  • Size. The egg weight difference was 0.29 g, small in absolute terms.
  • Cause. Microbial and production changes were observed together; the study does not show that one caused the other.
  • Reporting. The table and text disagree on the direction of total antioxidant capacity.
  • Transfer. One breed, one age, one dose and one preparation.

Which part of the framework it informs

  • Environmental conditions

    The physical, chemical and management context.

  • Microbial activity

    What microbial communities do within that context.

    This record informs this area.
  • Observable function

    What can be observed or measured in the host or wider system.

    This record informs this area.
Magnified view of a caecumThe wall of one of the hen's two caeca along the top, lined with mucus whose inner part holds few microbes. Below, fluid and fine digesta particles, the only material the caeca take in, with bacteria attached. A green tint marks the particles that microbes attach to and ferment.abcd
  • a Caecal wall
  • b Fine digesta
  • c Bacteria
  • d Mucus layer
Informs observable function and microbial activity, and shows the distinction between a change in community composition and a demonstrated microbial function. The magnified view marks the part of the system the study's microbial measures describe. It is a schematic, not to scale and not measured abundance, and no material is drawn in it.

Source, funding and review

Source type
Peer-reviewed publication
Associated products
The study tested a fulvic acid from a commercial supplier. This record does not assess an associated product.
Funding and relationships
Guangdong Province Modern Agriculture Poultry Industry technology system innovation team construction project and the Discipline Construction Program of Foshan University. The authors declare no commercial or financial conflict of interest.
Review status
Prepared as an editorial summary. External scientific review has not been completed.
What was read
Full text read on the publisher's page.
Original title
Effects of fulvic acid addition on laying performance, biochemical indices, and gut microbiota of aged hens
Authors
Xiao G, Liu S, Yan X, Yang Y, Qi Q, Feng X, Gong L, Zhang H
Publication
Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9:953564, 2 September 2022
DOI
10.3389/fvets.2022.953564
Summary prepared by
Carbon Biome Project
Date added
19 October 2026
Cite this summary
Carbon Biome Project. A fulvic preparation was studied in older laying hens. Evidence library record, added 19 October 2026. carbonbiomeproject.com/evidence/xiao-2022-fulvic-acid-aged-laying-hens/

Related records

The waiting list

Join the waiting list

Leave your email and we will send it to you when it is ready.

One email when your edition is ready. Nothing else.