Peer-reviewed publication · Livestock · In the living system

Broilers fed humic substances carried fewer antimicrobial‑resistant E. coli isolates.

Broilers fed these humic substances carried fewer resistant caecal E. coli isolates in this one trial, which measured resistance in the laboratory, not infection or the removal of any pathogen.

Pipová et al., 16 April 2025. Poultry Science 104(7):105175.

Scope, material and route

Studied
Male Ross 308 broilers, day 1 to day 37
Design
Controlled feeding trial with two groups
Material
A commercial leonardite-derived feed additive, at least 65 percent humic acids and 5 percent fulvic acids
Route
Feed
Exposure
0.7 percent of the diet. Study exposure, not application guidance.
Duration
37 days

Study design

  1. Standard diet

    40 birdsHoused in pens of 10.

    • Isolates tested58
    • Resistant to at least one antimicrobial52 of 58 (89.7 percent)
    • Multidrug resistant25 of 58 (43.1 percent)
  2. Plus 0.7 percent humic substances

    40 birdsHoused in pens of 10.

    • Isolates tested60
    • Resistant to at least one antimicrobial41 of 60 (68.3 percent)
    • Multidrug resistant12 of 60 (20.0 percent)
One mark per bird, boxed by pen. Feed was given by pen, but resistance was tested per isolate and the statistics did not account for pens. The paper reports one isolate per sample, and does not explain how 40 birds gave 58 and 60 isolates. Resistance phenotypes only; no genes, infection or disease were studied.

More study details

Research question
Does dietary humic substance supplementation change the phenotypic antimicrobial resistance of caecal E. coli in broilers?
Experimental unit and sample size
80 birds, 40 per group, housed in pens of 10 on deep litter; 58 control and 60 treatment isolates, one per sample
Comparator
The same feed without humic substances
Outcomes measured
Caecal E. coli counts; susceptibility to 19 antimicrobials by broth microdilution; screening for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production

Findings

Researchers raised 80 male Ross 308 broilers for 37 days, half on a standard diet and half on the same diet with 0.7 percent leonardite-derived humic substances. They counted E. coli in the caeca and tested isolates against 19 antimicrobials. Birds fed humic substances had lower caecal E. coli counts. Fewer of their isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial (68 against about 90 percent) and fewer were multidrug resistant (20 against 43 percent), with significant reductions for ampicillin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline and colistin. Only phenotypic resistance was measured. The proposed mechanism is speculative, and genetic studies would be needed to explain the result.

OutcomeComparison or resultInterpretation
Caecal E. coli count7.10 against 8.02 log cfu/g (P < 0.05)Lower with humic substances
Resistant to at least one antimicrobial68.3 against almost 90 percent of isolates (P < 0.01)Fewer resistant isolates
Multidrug resistance20.0 against 43.1 percent (P < 0.01)Fewer multidrug-resistant isolates
Ampicillin resistance21.7 against 53.5 percent (P < 0.001)Lower
Tetracycline resistance21.7 against 41.4 percent (P = 0.02)Lower
Colistin resistance3.3 against 17.2 percent (P = 0.01)Lower
Ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid resistance15.0 against 27.6 percent (P = 0.09); 33.3 against 34.5 percent (P = 0.90)No statistically supported difference

Values are humic substance group first, control second, as reported in the paper. Values are extracted from the source as reported; no raw data were available.

Interpretation and limits

What this record supports

A lower prevalence of phenotypically resistant caecal E. coli in broilers fed this preparation, in one controlled trial.

What remains uncertain

  • Mechanism. The authors propose binding of antimicrobials or effects on gene expression; neither was measured.
  • Design. Birds were housed in pens, and pen-level clustering was not addressed in the statistics.
  • Scope. Phenotypic resistance only, in one flock; genetic resistance determinants were not studied.

Which part of the framework it informs

  • Environmental conditions

    The physical, chemical and management context.

  • Microbial activity

    What microbial communities do within that context.

    This record informs this area.
  • Observable function

    What can be observed or measured in the host or wider system.

Magnified view of a caecumThe wall of one of the hen's two caeca along the top, lined with mucus whose inner part holds few microbes. Below, fluid and fine digesta particles, the only material the caeca take in, with bacteria attached. A green tint marks the particles that microbes attach to and ferment.abcd
  • a Caecal wall
  • b Fine digesta
  • c Bacteria
  • d Mucus layer
Informs microbial activity and evaluation methods. It is an example of an outcome defined at the level of the microbial community rather than the bird's performance. The magnified view marks the part of the system the study's microbial measures describe. It is a schematic, not to scale and not measured abundance, and no material is drawn in it.

Source, funding and review

Source type
Peer-reviewed publication
Associated products
This record does not assess an associated product.
Funding and relationships
Slovak Research and Development Agency and the European Regional Development Fund. The manufacturer of the feed additive is named in the paper. The authors declare no known competing financial interests.
Review status
Prepared as an editorial summary. External scientific review has not been completed.
What was read
Full text read on PubMed Central.
Original title
Effect of feed supplementation with humic substances on phenotypic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from the ceca of broiler chickens
Authors
Pipová M, Jevinová P, Semjon B, Regecová I, Marcinčák S, Nagy J
Publication
Poultry Science 104(7):105175, 16 April 2025
DOI
10.1016/j.psj.2025.105175
Summary prepared by
Carbon Biome Project
Date added
19 October 2026
Cite this summary
Carbon Biome Project. Broilers fed humic substances carried fewer antimicrobial‑resistant E. coli isolates. Evidence library record, added 19 October 2026. carbonbiomeproject.com/evidence/pipova-2025-humic-substances-broiler-e-coli-resistance/

Related records

The waiting list

Join the waiting list

Leave your email and we will send it to you when it is ready.

One email when your edition is ready. Nothing else.