Peer-reviewed publication · Companion animals · In the living system

A high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet shifted faecal bacteria in overweight cats, while no single group changed in lean cats.

  • No humic or fulvic material tested

At stable body weight, a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet shifted faecal bacteria more clearly in overweight cats than in lean ones; it was not a weight-loss study, and microbial functions were predicted, not measured.

Li and Pan, 16 October 2020. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:591462.

Scope, material and route

Studied
Neutered domestic shorthair cats, mean age about 7 years; lean (body condition 4 to 5 of 9, body fat 20 percent or less) or overweight (7 to 9 of 9, body fat 25 percent or more)
Design
Eight weeks on the control diet for all cats, then eight weeks with cats in each body condition group randomly assigned, balanced for sex, age and body fat, to continue the control diet or switch
Setting
Individually housed colony cats with a shared activity room; protocol approved by the funder's animal care committee
What changed
Isocaloric dry diets with animal protein as the primary source; protein raised by replacing grains with plant protein
Route
Feed, fed to maintain body weight
Exposure
51.35 percent protein and 11.60 percent carbohydrate against 32.43 and 32.30 percent; fat 14.60 against 14.30 percent; total dietary fibre 12.70 against 11.20 percent. Study exposure, not application guidance.
Duration
Eight weeks baseline, then eight weeks intervention

Study design

  1. Lean cats

    19 cats10 switched to high protein; 9 stayed on the control diet.

    • Overall communityShifted with diet (P = 0.008)
    • Individual taxaNone differed
  2. Overweight cats

    20 cats10 switched; 10 stayed on the control diet.

    • Overall communityShifted with diet (P = 0.000029)
    • Fusobacteria8.1-fold higher on high protein
    • Five generaShifted in relative abundance
  3. What kind of result

    • MeasuredBacterial composition, by 16S sequencing; body fat
    • Predicted, not measuredMicrobial pathways, inferred from 16S data
    • Not measuredShort-chain fatty acids and other metabolites

Sixteen weeks, by week

One faecal sample per cat at the end of each phase, weeks 8 and 16, marked above the bar.

  1. Control diet, all cats 8 weeks
  2. Assigned diet 8 weeks
Cats were fed to keep body weight steady, and body fat did not change, so the study does not test weight management. One lean cat had no final sample. The stronger response in overweight cats comes from comparing results within each group; no interaction test is reported.

More study details

Research question
How does a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet change the faecal microbiome of overweight compared with lean cats?
Experimental unit and sample size
The individual cat; 39 cats (lean: 10 high-protein, 9 control; overweight: 10 and 10); 77 faecal samples, one lean cat having no final sample
Comparator
Cats in the same body condition group that continued the control diet
Outcomes measured
Faecal bacteria by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (V3 to V4), body weight, body condition and body fat by quantitative magnetic resonance; microbial pathways predicted with PICRUSt

Findings

Researchers at Nestlé Purina fed 20 overweight and 19 lean adult cats a control diet (32.4 percent protein, 32.3 percent carbohydrate) for eight weeks, then randomly assigned about half of each group to a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet (51.4 and 11.6 percent) for eight more weeks, feeding to maintain body weight. Faecal bacterial communities differed by diet in both groups, more strongly in overweight cats. In overweight cats Fusobacteria rose about eightfold and five genera described as short-chain fatty acid producers shifted; in lean cats no individual taxon differed. Body fat did not change. Fatty acids were not measured, functional pathways were predicted rather than measured, and both authors are employees of the funder.

OutcomeComparison or resultInterpretation
Body fatNo change from start to end in any group (P > 0.05)Weight was held steady by design
Overall community (unweighted UniFrac)Differed among the four body condition and diet groups (P = 0.000001); diet effect P = 0.000029 in overweight and P = 0.008 in lean catsDiet changed the overall community in both groups
Individual taxa, lean catsNo taxon differed between diets at any rank (adjusted P > 0.05)A null at the level of single taxa
Fusobacteria, overweight cats3.89 against 0.48 percent, 8.1-fold higher on the high-protein diet (adjusted P = 0.001)A large relative increase
Genera, overweight catsFaecalibacterium (4.5-fold) and Fusobacterium higher; Megasphaera, Veillonella and Bifidobacterium lower on the high-protein diet (adjusted P < 0.05)Shifts in relative abundance; the fatty acids these genera produce were not measured
Clostridium, overweight catsHigher on the control diet before adjustment (P = 0.007), not after (adjusted P = 0.057)Not statistically supported
Alpha diversityNo difference between lean and overweight cats after baseline; at the end, Faith's PD 27.0 (lean, high-protein) against 30.5 (overweight, control), P = 0.019A difference between groups, not a clear diet effect
Microbes and clinical measuresNo association between microbial abundance and age, sex, body weight, body condition or body fatNo link to body measures in this study
Predicted pathwaysPathways for energy and one-carbon (folate) metabolism enriched in overweight control cats; none in lean catsPredicted from 16S data, not measured

High-protein diet against control diet at the end of the intervention unless stated. Fold changes and adjusted P-values are from Table 3. Values are extracted from the source as reported; no raw data were available.

Interpretation and limits

What this record supports

A shift in the relative abundance of several faecal bacterial groups in overweight cats fed this high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet for eight weeks at stable body weight.

What remains uncertain

  • Function. Short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites were not measured; calling the genera fatty acid producers draws on other studies, and the pathways were predicted from 16S data.
  • Health. No weight loss, metabolic or clinical outcome was assessed, and cats were fed to keep weight stable, so the result does not show a weight-management effect.
  • Lean against overweight. The stronger response in overweight cats rests on comparing results within each group; no diet by body condition interaction test is reported, and lean cats did show an overall community shift (P = 0.008).
  • Statistics. Taxon tests compared end-of-baseline samples as a third group alongside the two end-of-intervention groups, though they came from the same cats.
  • Reporting. The pathway count (nine) does not match the pathways listed; the Fusobacteria adjusted P-value is 0.001 in Table 3 and 0.01 in the discussion; the pathway threshold is P < 0.01 in the results and P < 0.05 in the supplementary table title.
  • Transfer. Colony cats on two experimental diets in which plant protein replaced grain; commercial diets differ in more than one nutrient at a time.

Which part of the framework it informs

  • Environmental conditions

    The physical, chemical and management context.

  • Microbial activity

    What microbial communities do within that context.

    This record informs this area.
  • Observable function

    What can be observed or measured in the host or wider system.

    This record informs this area.
Magnified view of the cat's large intestineThe colon wall along the top, lined with mucus whose inner part holds few microbes. Below, mostly protein-rich food residue with only a little plant fibre, as in an obligate carnivore, with bacteria attached to the residue. A green tint marks the residue that microbes attach to and break down.abcd
  • a Colon wall
  • b Food residue
  • c Bacteria
  • d Mucus layer
Informs observable function and evaluation methods. It separates a measured change in community composition from functions that were only predicted, and shows that one diet change can register differently in animals of different body condition. The magnified view marks the part of the system the study's microbial measures describe. It is a schematic, not to scale and not measured abundance, and no material is drawn in it.

Source, funding and review

Source type
Peer-reviewed publication
Associated products
No humic or fulvic material was tested. This record does not assess an associated product.
Funding and relationships
Funded by the Nestlé Purina PetCare Company. Both authors are employees of the company; one designed the diets, and the protocol was approved by the company's own animal care committee. The funding statement says the funder was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or writing.
Review status
Prepared as an editorial summary. External scientific review has not been completed.
What was read
Full text read on PubMed Central (full-text XML via Europe PMC). Supplementary tables and figures were not read.
Original title
Differential Responses to Dietary Protein and Carbohydrate Ratio on Gut Microbiome in Obese vs. Lean Cats
Authors
Li Q, Pan Y
Publication
Frontiers in Microbiology 11:591462, 16 October 2020
DOI
10.3389/fmicb.2020.591462
Summary prepared by
Carbon Biome Project
Date added
19 October 2026
Cite this summary
Carbon Biome Project. A high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet shifted faecal bacteria in overweight cats, while no single group changed in lean cats. Evidence library record, added 19 October 2026. carbonbiomeproject.com/evidence/li-pan-2020-protein-carbohydrate-obese-lean-cats/

Related records

The waiting list

Join the waiting list

Leave your email and we will send it to you when it is ready.

One email when your edition is ready. Nothing else.